Explained: New Navy UFO Videos

Publiée 2:54284 k vuesen
YouTube
Note interne 61/100PassionnéContenu durableDémonstration

Pourquoi cette vidéo a été sélectionnée

Partagée sur Hacker News (27 points, 6 commentaires). Points forts estimés : profondeur technique, valeur pédagogique, contenu durable.

Recommandations à l'origine de la sélection

Description de l'auteur — Afficher plus

Today the Navy officially released three videos of UFOs. They are called FLIR, GIMBAL and GOFAST. The internet immediately took this as meaning that aliens are real. But the videos are not actually new. They were internally declassified back in 2017, and immediately released by Tom DeLonge's To The Stars Academy. I started writing about them in December 2017. With the help of others, I quickly arrived at likely explanations for all three videos. The FLIR video is most likely a distant plane. The video was taken well after the famous encounter with a hypersonic zig-zagging tic-tac by pilots from the NIMITZ. This object doesn't actually move on screen - except when the camera moves, and it resembles an out of focus low-resolution backlit plane. I don't know what the pilots saw, but this video does not show anything really interesting. The GIMBAL video is also probably of a plane. .... It's not rotating. What you see is the infrared glare of the engines, larger than the plane. It looks like it is rotating because of an artifact of the gimbal-mounted camera system. This is all a bit confusing, so I made several videos explaining it. Oh, and the "AURA" around the plane, that's just image sharpening. It happens all the time in thermal camera footage. It's not an alien warp drive, it's just the unsharp mask filter. The GO-FAST video probably shows a balloon. It's not moving fast, it's not skimming the water, and you can verify this yourself because all the information you need is in the numbers on screen. It's just an effect caused by parallax. Over the last few years, I've made a variety of videos explaining all this. You can find the playlist here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-4ZqTjKmhn5Qr0tCHkCVnqTx_c0P3O2t If you've got questions (especially about the GIMBAL video) then I probably covered it there, or it would be covered in the various discussion on Metabunk. If it's not covered, then let me know (mick@mickwest.com), and I'll try to find an answer. All I'm explaining here are these three videos, not other videos. And I'm not explaining any eyewitness accounts. These three videos are not as interesting as they seem and they have quite plausible explanations. The Navy probably arrived at similar conclusions - that these are simply unidentified aircraft, drones, or balloons - but because of the default operational secrecy regulations nobody can talk about it. And that opened the door to all this speculation. Hopefully, I've cleared it up a little. Visiting aliens are always a possible explanation for any UFO video, but these videos don't show evidence of any kind of advanced technology - so, unfortunately, the real explanations, while fun to investigate, are probably pretty boring. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-4ZqTjKmhn5Qr0tCHkCVnqTx_c0P3O2t

Détail de la note
Pertinence thématique66Pertinence thématique estimée à 66 % (univers principal : nautisme)
Profondeur technique68Profondeur technique estimée à 68 % d'après le titre, la description et la durée
Qualité pédagogique87Valeur pédagogique estimée à 87 %
Intérêt historiquenon mesurablePas de dimension historique détectée (non mesurable)
Originaliténon mesurableNon mesurable sans analyse par modèle de langage
Crédibilité de l'auteurnon mesurableCrédibilité de la chaîne non évaluée
Recommandations indépendantes571 recommandeur distinct ; soumission votée 27 fois
Recommandations dans la durée15Recommandée sur 1 mois distinct, 1 année différente
Valeur durable80Contenu durable
Rareté50284 386 vues sur YouTube
Fraîcheurnon mesurableSans objet pour un contenu durable

Confiance 62 % · score-v1 · heuristic-2026.11.1 · méthode